“General William M. Creasy, former chief chemical officer, U.S. Army, testified to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1959 that "provided sufficient emphasis is put behind it, I think the future lies in the psychochemicals."[9] This was alarming enough to a Harvard psychiatrist, E. James Lieberman, that he published an article entitled "Psychochemicals as Weapons" in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in 1962. Lieberman, while acknowledging that "most of the military data" on the research ongoing at the Army Chemical Center was "secret and unpublished", asserted that "There are moral imponderables, such as whether insanity, temporary or permanent, is a more 'humane' military threat than the usual afflictions of war."[10]”
”The court granted the plaintiffs partial summary judgment concerning the notice claim: summarily adjudicating in plaintiffs' favor, finding that "the Army has an ongoing duty to warn" and ordering "the Army, through the DVA or otherwise, to provide test subjects with newly acquired information that may affect their well-being that it has learned since its original notification, now and in the future as it becomes available"”
“The problems among sane, healthy people may be even worse than among the psychically fragile.
These stable individuals are essential to the smooth running of society—but they will no longer have the shared basis of reality we once took for granted.
They will have their own beliefs, and their own experiences—but others may now refuse to acknowledge them.
That’s because all evidence is tainted.
In a world with pervasive deception, everything demands skepticism.
Consider those who believe that the moon landing never happened.
Now imagine a world in which everybody is like that about everything—because nothing can be proven.”
